Prediction of Monique Javer vs Heather Bates Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Javer vs H. Bates

Monique Javer

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

562

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Heather Bates

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

562

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Javer 1 - 0 Bates

They have played 2 sets in total, with Monique Javer winning 2 and Heather Bates winning 0. The last match between Monique Javer and Heather Bates was at the ITF Edinburgh 2, 08-05-1995, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Monique Javer getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Javer	1
Bates	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Edinburgh 2(05-08-95)

Stats

Monique Javer

Heather Bates

M. Javer vs H. Bates H2H Profile

M. Javer	Stats	H. Bates
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
39.43% (110-169)	Career Total W/L	29.03% (18-44)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Javer vs H. Bates Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Monique Javer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Heather Bates has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Monique Javer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heather Bates has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Monique Javer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heather Bates has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Monique Javer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Heather Bates winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Monique Javer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 72/94), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 31% (W/L 11/24). Heather Bates has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 3/12).
Player level: In the last year, Monique Javer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Heather Bates has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Monique Javer winning 1 times and Heather Bates being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Monique Javer winning 2 and Heather Bates winning 0.
The last match between Monique Javer and Heather Bates was at the ITF Edinburgh 2, 08-05-1995, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Monique Javer getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Monique Javer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Heather Bates has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Monique Javer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heather Bates has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Monique Javer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heather Bates has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Monique Javer vs Heather Bates Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Javer vs H. Bates H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Javer	Stats	H. Bates
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Javer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Acura Classic - San Diego, California - 31-07-2000
Q1 Olga BarabanschikovaO. Barabanschikova	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Bank of the West Classic - Stanford, California - 24-07-2000
Q1 Janet LeeJ. Lee	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Cardiff 50K - 14-10-1996
R3 Mariana Diaz OlivaM. Diaz	L	5-7 6-2 6-0	Stats
Surabaya - 07-10-1996
R3 Ludmila RichterovaL. Richterova	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
El Paso 10K - 27-05-1996
R3 Jennifer PoulosJ. Poulos	L	7-5 6-0	Stats

View All

H. Bates Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Nottingham 10K - 30-09-1996
R4 Lucie AhlL. Ahl	L	6-0 7-6	Stats
R3 Victoria DaviesV. Davies	W	6-2 4-6 6-1	Stats
Telford 10K - 23-09-1996
R3 Elissa BurtonE. Burton	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
R4 Natalia EgorovaN. Egorova	L	6-2 6-7 6-1	Stats
Southsea 10K - 05-08-1996
R3 Katia RoubanovaK. Roubanova	W	1-6 6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Javer vs H. Bates Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Javer	Stats	H. Bates
39.43% (110/169)	YTD Win/Loss	29.03% (18/44)
42.70% (266/357)	Sets Win/Loss	33.33% (47/94)
47.03% (2616/2946)	Games Win/Loss	44.34% (564/708)
43.37% (72/94)	Hard Win/Loss	37.50% (9/15)
40.91% (9/13)	Clay Win/Loss	27.78% (5/13)
30.30% (10/23)	Indoor Hard W/L	20.00% (1/4)
34.78% (8/15)	Grass Win/Loss	20.00% (3/12)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
376.05	Average Opponent Rank	578.39
22.22% (2/7)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
63.64% (7/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
47.83% (11/12)	Challenger W/L	28.57% (12/30)
30.30% (10/23)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
40% (110/277)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	28% (17/61)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
29% (4/14)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	14% (1/7)
31% (20/65)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (6/18)
78% (132/103)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (18/14)
21% (132/28)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	22% (18/4)
5% (147/7)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (44/4)